Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Transfer Rumor: Bolton On Verge of First Signings

Midway Through The Season, What Needs To Be Fixed?

AUSTIN, TX - OCTOBER 15:  Running back Jeremy Smith #31, center,  of the Oklahoma State University Cowboys is congratulated by tight end Wilson Youman #86, left, and wide receiver Justin Blackmon #81, right, after running in a second quarter touchdown against the Texas Longhorns on October 15, 2011 at Darrell K. Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium in Austin, Texas. Oklahoma State beat Texas 38-26.  (Photo by Erich Schlegel/Getty Images)

At 6-0, OSU is right where we all thought they would be at this point during the season including a top five BCS ranking that is icing on the cake. I don't know if any of us would have predicted that the computers would love the Pokes as much as they currently do.

On top of that, the team is very healthy for the most part. The only two major injuries sustained have been at positions where there is enough depth to keep the ball rolling. This isn't to say that Jonathan Rush or Devin Hedgepeth aren't missed. Their experience cannot simply be replaced. But their backups do have reps under their belts and that will ultimately lead to better depth going forward.

With all that said, there are still issues that this team faces that must either be limited or eliminated in order for OSU to have the dream season we all hope they will have. How quickly this all comes about will determine whether or not the Pokes can make it to Bedlam unscathed and ready to win its first Big 12 Championship.

Click the jump for some analysis. 

Star-divide

Stopping The Run

By now, I'm sure everyone is pulling their hair out due to some of the defensive "issues." No issue is more criticized right now than OSU's inability to stop the run at certain times. The problem here is what we knew it would be before the season even started. The linebackers are young and/or inexperienced. I thought by this time that a healthy Tyler Johnson would solve some of these problems. Unfortunately, he was sidelined with a knee injury for the majority of the games placed thus far and therefore has not had the game reps needed to become a difference maker just yet.

Back to the current situation, there are two major problems with the run defense. 1) Alex Elkins has a bunch of athleticism but not a lot of experience. 2) Caleb Lavey has experience but not enough athleticism. He especially has trouble fighting through blocks and getting to the ball carrier before he gets to the second level. Their inconsistent play hurts us the most when speedbacks get to the perimeter as Lavey doesn't have the speed and Elkins takes bad pursuit angles.

Unfortunately, this is no easy fix. Practice and game reps will help Elkins. Lavey will improve his strength and technique as well but the position itself will get much better as Tyler Johnson continues to progress behind him. Other than that, our safeties and defensive ends will need to continue to play their butts off in run support to make up for some of the present weakness in the middle.

Brandon Weeden's Temperment

Continue to cross your fingers every time he goes out on the field and gets frustrated with the lack of production. As it usually goes, his level of competitiveness is both his greatest strength and greatest weakness. It would be hard for any quarterback to go from the Kansas game (where everything the offense did, worked) to the Texas game (where they literally sold out to stop the pass).

Still, Weeden must keep himself composed. He forces at least one or two really bad balls per game (three or four during the Texas game) and somehow has gotten lucky enough to not have any picked in the last three outings. 

The solution here has always been the same and has been preached by the coaches all season. Stay calm. Understand that not every drive is always going to result in a touchdown. An interception is always worse than a punt. Also, with the athletes we have at the skill positions in this offense there's always going to be a better option than a forced throw into an extremely tight window.

Playcalling

This is starting to concern me just a bit. It seems that in the two tough games OSU has played there has been a bit of stubbornness to Todd Monken's playcalling. Against Texas A&M, he was hell bent on running the ball in the first half. He wanted to establish the running game even when the Aggies were loading the box. It took a plea from Mike Gundy to get him to start spreading the wealth to our other playmakers. When the offense finally went that route, we all saw the tremendous results.

Fast forward to the Texas Longhorn game. This time, Monken was dead set on passing the ball even though Texas was playing the majority of the game with only three down linemen and SIX defensive backs. It should have been obvious even in the few times OSU ran the ball early on that the ground game was going to be successful all day long. Despite the evidence, though, Monken continued to air it out (including back to back incomplete streak plays to Blackmon that nearly got picked off each time). The two Jeremy Smith runs for touchdowns mimicked the success OSU had in the earlier A&M game when OSU finally adjusted their gameplan to what the defense was giving them.

The question now becomes how much longer can the offense get away with being so stubborn? I don't think this has anything to do with inexperience at playcalling. I think this is how Coach Monken is built. He has a cockiness to him which serves as an advantage and disadvantage much like Weeden's competitive drive. I think he says "I don't care if they are trying to take it away. I'm going to show them that we'll still get it done regardless." Unfortunately, this is not always the case. Only converting 2 of 12 third down attempts against Texas proved that. Coach Monken must adjust earlier and more often in upcoming games. Otherwise, more talented opposing offenses won't be so forgiving. 

Comment 20 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

playcalling

glad i am not the only one concerned with monken’s play calling. gundy says “we will take what they give us.” not happening.

more than that though, what happened to weeden “audibling us out of a bad play”?

by osufan1974 on Oct 19, 2011 9:56 AM CDT reply actions  

Easy Now

I know our offense is awesome and during the TX game they didn’t live up to their average output (551.2 yds/gm), but here’s another way to look at it. OSU gained 419 total yards against UT. OSU’s defense is ranked 100th in the nation with a 426.7 yds/gm average. So, OSU made UT’s defense look like the 100th defense in the nation. UT’s actual defensive rank is 32nd. They may not be the best D OSU faces all year, but 32nd ain’t bad either. Let’s give UT some of the credit for slowing down the pokes.

I don’t really have a problem with the play calling to this point. 6-0 is pretty nice, wasn’t that long ago 6-0 would’ve been cause to celebrate excessively. I like the idea that ,as long as OSU is winning, Joey Gladstone wants to impose his will on the opposing D. It may have gotten them in a hole against A&M but they won. As long as he doesn’t end up getting them into a hole like that again, I say try to force your gameplan down opponents’ throats. You don’t improve by taking the easy way, and come Dec 3rd it’d be great if they’ve improved to the point that they can dictate how the game goes rather than just taking what the D gives them.

For what it's worth...

by Something Witty on Oct 19, 2011 10:39 AM CDT reply actions  

query

so back to back interception throws by weeden to blackmon does not concern you? when there are only 3 defenders in the box?

by osufan1974 on Oct 19, 2011 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Of course it does

But hypathetically in Bedlam, OU has some pretty good players on the defensive front. My guess is they’ll feel confident that they can stop the run with 4-5 players in the box. If they’re right and OSU isn’t running it effectively OU will be able to drop 6-7 into coverage. To win Weeden is going to have to find the holes in that coverage. On the other side of the coin let’s say in the national championship game OSU faces a D with Revis like D backs. The Line is going to have to man up and make holes in an 8 man box. The point I’m making is I think it is okay to put Weeden into situations where he has to try and throw against 5-6 defenders, and to make the line try to establish the run against a D that is stacked in the box while they’re facing teams they should beat. Will mistakes happen? Probably. Wouldn’t you rather see mistakes against UT than OU? I’m saying chalk it up to getting reps against adverse defensive schemes.

For what it's worth...

by Something Witty on Oct 19, 2011 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

hope you are right

agree. would rather see mistakes against ut than ou. but not against mu or kst. and did not like seeing inflexible commitmment vs ut after it bombed at ta&m.

by osufan1974 on Oct 19, 2011 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Against UT

The outcome would have looked much worse for the Longhorns had Monken utilized the run game earlier on. Like I said, the few times we ran the ball early we had a lot of success doing it.

OSU had FIVE three and outs. That puts the defense back onto the field far too quickly and may have attributed to them being abused in the run game.

Also, as stated in the article, OSU was only 2 for 12 on third downs. Most of that was because we were forced to throw on third and long. Run the ball on either first or second down and OSU is probably not in that situation for at least half of those third down situations.

I don’t look at changing the game plan as taking the “easy” way as much as I see it as taking the “smart” way. Just like Gundy preaches: Take what the defense gives you. Doing so resulted in long touchdown runs for Jeremy Smith.

Cowboys Ride For Free

by Royal John on Oct 19, 2011 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

“The outcome would have looked much worse for the Longhorns had Monken utilized the run game earlier on.” You’re almost agreeing with my point in this sentance. OSU won. Comfortably, of course maybe I was only comfortable because I was hammered. Had OSU gotten in a hole ala A&M I’d agree wholeheartedly, but style points don’t matter. Reps matter. I’m playing devils advocate here, but what if the coaches knew they could beat UT and the playcalling had more to do with getting reps in certain situations than it did simply putting up big numbers?

For what it's worth...

by Something Witty on Oct 19, 2011 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Eh, I think that is wishful thinking.

Like I said, it may have worked against UT but against teams with better talent we’re going to have to make adjustments much quicker.

Cowboys Ride For Free

by Royal John on Oct 19, 2011 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good Call

Royal, I found your observations to be insightful and on point. I also have concerns with OSU’s run defense – there’s an issue if the safeties are having to bail out the linebackers and D-line. Certainly MLB has been a concern all year long; however, Lavey (and now Johnson) has finally started to show up more on the stat sheet at the end of games. But the contrast between these two and the Donald Booker/ Orie Lemon combo is drastic. (Lemon finished 3rd in the NCAA for solo tackles.)

Regarding Weeden, more experience (this is like his 18th game?) should also help his decision making. He’s a bright guy; he’s already started to figure it out.

Monken’s play calling is harder to judge. I don’t think it’s that he’s not adaptable to game conditions, he just has an idea of how it’s supposed to be done – you know, imposing our will on theirs, etc. and hasn’t learned when it’s time to change tactics without necessarily abandoning your game strategy.
     The difference is that OSU still does not have superior physical specimens on the O-line and D-line to do that week-in, week-out. (We’re getting better, but not there, yet.) This is reason #1 why Coach Gundy went with Holgorsen’s spread offense in the first place. When 1st down goes for no gain or an incomplete pass, that puts a little more stress on the play calling to make it up on 2nd down.

by G-Block on Oct 19, 2011 11:05 AM CDT reply actions  

I agree with everything except...

OSU not having superior O-linemen. We absolutely have one of the best O-lines in the country and will continue to as long as Coach Wick is here.

I think we went with the Holgorsen offense because Gundy knew what he had at QB and at the receiver positions. Play to your strengths.

Cowboys Ride For Free

by Royal John on Oct 19, 2011 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Dont shoot me!! And I bitch ALOT about crappy play calling BUT:

I think it is interesting that most commenters are bantering about the offense. Is it because you think the defense is fine? Or is it because you think the O will have to score virtually at will, to win down the stretch? Its just odd to me that you would nit pick the offense, but glaze over the porous defense on the field?

It is strange dont you think that the OC is getting “kinda blasted” for the lack of run game, when that was a problem down the stretch last year, even with Holgorson. Why is it happening? Also I though Weeden was actually calling the plays on the field, is that not correct?

by OU JJ on Oct 19, 2011 6:35 PM CDT reply actions  

Eh, I think it's because everyone knows that defense is the soft spot.

People expect the offense to fire on all cylinders so when it doesn’t, there is concern. And nobody is blasting the OC for ignoring the run game by itself. In fact, he tried to stay with it too long during the A&M game. I just feel like he needs to adjust sooner to what the defense is doing whether that be stacking the box or trying to take away the pass.

Also, the defense isn’t porous. It only gave up seven more points to Texas than OU did and OSU played them in Austin. In other blowouts, the starters were out by the third quarter so I don’t put much stock into total game statistics.

With that said, I do have concerns about our linebackers as stated in the article.

Cowboys Ride For Free

by Royal John on Oct 19, 2011 10:59 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Not you per se, the commenters.

But is Weeden not calling the plays? That was the impression I had early on. Is he being given free reign, does he have a few in the huddle or what?

by OU JJ on Oct 19, 2011 11:33 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Weeden calls audibles. That's all.

Somehow quotes from newspapers got mixed up and turned into “Weeden can change the entire play on the line into whatever he wants” when that isn’t true.

Cowboys Ride For Free

by Royal John on Oct 20, 2011 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

TY for clarifying.

So basically weeden isn’t audibling out of those bad plays you referred to against A&M and texass?

by OU JJ on Oct 20, 2011 5:42 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I'm sure he did at points.

I just don’t know when or what the situation was.

Cowboys Ride For Free

by Royal John on Oct 21, 2011 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

OU starters gave up 6 points, and 36 yards rushing....

It’s not about comparing texass, i just think it’s odd. I am bitching about OU play calling from the 10 in. But if I had a defense like OSU, I’d be bitching about it. Just a difference of perspective is all. I actually do believe you have to play defense to win consistently & at a high level.

by OU JJ on Oct 19, 2011 11:43 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

My concern

Is our run defense. I’m thankful that TAMU’s coach decided to not give the ball to whatshisname in the second half after he torched us in the first half. They are a weird bunch though.

I don’t know for sure, but I doubt Weeden is calling the plays. Audibles, yes. Play calling, no.

by OSUtopia on Oct 19, 2011 11:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm - we aren't coaches

We talk about offense because defense is boring to talk about. Go to any teams blog and the talk will be like 15% about defense.

by OStateJasper on Oct 20, 2011 8:16 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A blog for those that love Stillwater, love the way they shave the canadian bacon at Hideaway, love Garth Brooks (un-ironically), love drinking coldish beer out of a plastic 22 ounce collectible cup, and love everything else that makes us Cowboys.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

39766_134323999942569_113657452009224_160227_7181545_n_small
Identity issues for the Mothership

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Samuel_small samuelbryant

Editors

Cincy_small CincyJoe

Crown_small Royal John

Authors

Camoblackice_small AUKingOState

Yachoff3_small Yachoffsmirnoff

Small Pokelahoma1