Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Transfer Rumor: Bolton On Verge of First Signings

Introducing the SB Nation Conference Re-Draft Project

Missed the incredibly indulgent Conference Armageddon post that lead us to this point?  Check it out here.

If there is one universal in college athletics it is that all fans believe that the NCAA has done 90% of things incorrectly. The latest and most prolific of these second guesses being the configuration of the conferences. Well we are here to re-draft all that, and to invent teleporting while we are at it... bear with me here.

A few weeks ago I had an idea to basically treat all the NCAA schools and athletic programs as free agents, with 6 commissioners holding a fantasy style draft to fill up their empty conferences. Thanks to some overwhelmingly positive response from many of my SB Nation blogging peers, this idea developed and became what you will read below:  The SB Nation Conference Re-Draft Project.
 

GAME OBJECTIVES

The purposes of the fantasy draft are: (1) to explore the values of individual schools by drafting them sequentially, and (2) to have fun strategically building a conference of schools.

There will be six conferences, and such conferences are NOT meant to be new versions of current conferences. That is, the objective of the game is not to create tweaked versions of what we already have. The goal is to draft schools based on their overall value, and to compile a conference of teams strategically and coherently. 

What makes a school valuable? Well as one of the six conference commissioners, we leave that largely up to you, with a few important guidelines. First, bearing in mind that we are drafting athletics conferences, athletics should be weighted heaviest, if not exclusively.

While obviously we must consider athletics, the following are factors you may, but are not required to consider:

Academics
Co-eds
Weather/Desirability of Destination
Historic Success
Traditions
TV Revenue Potential
Ethics
Rivalries (two teams)

On the flipside, for purposes of this game there are two factors that are NOT to be considered. First, do not take travel/geographic concerns into consideration (I told you we invented teleporting).  In real life, Washington and Florida are unrealistic conference partners; in our world, that doesn't matter -- neither from a travel or time zone standpoint. Second, and related, while we may take individual rivalries into consideration (e.g. pairing Michigan and Ohio State), preservation of current conference history/rivalry/alliance is not to be considered. Hopefully for obvious reasons.

Finally, the goal is not to improve the status quo. The goal is not to create a conference that will actually play games. The goal is to use a draft to value schools and have fun strategically grouping them together.

In sum, there is no single way that schools must be valued and/or grouped together. Some may wish to create the best conference of all-around athletics-academics combination. Others may want to create a revenue superpower. There are any number of valid ways to do this. The only limitation is not creating a group that is based on regional and historical ties. Time to wipe the slate clean and start over.

Star-divide

 

CONFERENCE COMMISSIONERS

As mentioned above, there will be six conference commissioners: House of Sparky (Arizona State), Big East Coast Bias (Big East), Black Heart Gold Pants (Iowa), Team Speed Kills (SEC), Red Cup Rebellion (Ole Miss), and BC Interruption (Boston College).

An (incredibly) important note: The six conference commissioners will start with a blank slate. House of Sparky, Black Heart Gold Pants and Red Cup Rebellion will not be starting with Arizona State, Iowa or Ole Miss in their conference already. If we want our own schools, we'll have to draft them. 

The draft order was determined by a random generator thingy and is as follows.

1. BC Interruption

2. Black Heart Gold Pants
3. Team Speed Kills
4. Big East Coast Bias
5. House of Sparky
6. Red Cup Rebellion

For now the conferences will be referred to as Conference #1, #2, #3, and you can probably figure out the rest.  As they develop, the commissioners and selected schools may decide to give their conference a name.

The draft will be a snake draft, with Red Cup Rebellion receiving the 6th and 7th picks.

The draft is officially being run here on Cowboys Ride For Free, so I will have the final say in the matter in any and all disputes (ensuing power trip montage).

One quick note: When a school is drafted, all athletic programs from that school go to the conference.  So enjoy that Duke football program whoever gets them

THE DRAFT SCHEDULE

The draft will proceed along the following schedule:

Monday, June 6 - Sunday, June 12: Introduction week. This week will be spent introducing the idea, and discussing the draft strategies and such across all blogs, particularly the conference commissioner blogs.

Monday, June 13 - Sunday, June 19: The first two rounds of the draft will be held behind the scenes with the commissioners making the picks utilizing their own judgment, and hopefully input from their readers.

Monday, June 20: The first official posts go live. At Cowboys Ride For Free, I will announce the conference names and recap the first two rounds of the draft.

After the big reveal of conference names and founding members, the draft will continue in much the same manner, with two draft picks a week for the next several weeks. Once a conference drafts 12 members, a conference can be capped. If we want, the draft will continue for conferences who wish to add more members. If in any subsequent round only one conference remains, it may select the remaining members of its conference up to a maximum of 16 schools.

And that is it for the rules!

Since this site is now the official last word on conference building, what does everyone think about the project?
What would your draft strategy be?
Who is the first pick?
Who will pay to have Dan Beebe's longhorn tramp stamp removed?

Comment 30 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

awesome idea...

But why no Big 12 representation?

by TowerPower on Jun 7, 2011 8:40 AM CDT reply actions  

I just took the first 6 people that responded to be the commissioners.

I guess since it is hosted here, there is some kind of representation. Plus, I assume Texas will be the first pick, so at that point they will obviously take over the entire conference.

by samuelbryant on Jun 7, 2011 9:28 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

The only part I have an issue with is that you're not taking regions into account.

It will still be fun, but I think it would be incredibly interesting to see how things shaped up if a “1 time zone difference rule” were in effect. A rule like that would immediately remove Arkansas and LSU from the SEC, and would utterly devastate the Big 10.

Innovators look at the same thing as everyone else, yet see something different.

by K. Scott Bailey on Jun 7, 2011 12:31 PM CDT reply actions  

That would be a fun variation on this game

But I like the way we’ve set it up better, because the limitations in your version substantially narrow the universe of possibilities. We wanted it to be possible for a commissioner to draft Florida with one pick, and UCLA the next.

You ain't hurt...

by Peter Bean on Jun 7, 2011 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

But wouldn't any even somewhat realistic scenario "narrow the universe of possibilities"?

What I’m getting at is that if this is just some fun summer time navel-gazing, then having no actual parameters works. But if it is to be truly useful in examining what a post-apocalypse football world would look like, it would need to have some type of regional restrictions.

Innovators look at the same thing as everyone else, yet see something different.

by K. Scott Bailey on Jun 8, 2011 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

totally agree

this wouldnt work in the real world. We actually originally talked about it being a real world environment where 6 conferences would have to be built with travel and regionalism considered. The consensus though was that we would basically create something far too close to the current conferences which wouldnt be as much fun. I still like the idea of doing it this way though, perhaps after this one is finished.

by samuelbryant on Jun 8, 2011 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

I guess so.

As far as this exercise goes, it sounds like it’s not going to have a whole lot of real-world usefulness, which is fine. We can all use a bit of navel-gazing during the slow summer months, I guess.

Innovators look at the same thing as everyone else, yet see something different.

by K. Scott Bailey on Jun 8, 2011 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

A 1 time zone rule would pretty much have to leave the Pac 10 as is - right?

Since the pacific time zone couldn’t be combined with anyone outside of the mountain time zone.

by Texas Wahoo on Jun 7, 2011 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

I guess that a 2 time zone restriction for the coastal leagues would work.

Innovators look at the same thing as everyone else, yet see something different.

by K. Scott Bailey on Jun 8, 2011 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Because I love fantasy football comparisons...

Would a school with non-traditional athletic success (swimming, tennis, track, etc) be considered the “Kickers” of the draft and be selected last?

If booster revenue comes into play, what are the odds that Oregon and Oklahoma State end up in the same conference?

by Royal John on Jun 7, 2011 12:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Love this idea.

Who do you think are the top 5? I would go with:

1) Texas
2) USC
3) Florida
4) Ohio State
5) Michigan

All 5 bring wealth, brand name, great academics, and huge alumni bases.

by Art Corvelay on Jun 8, 2011 12:18 AM CDT reply actions  

that is a tough call

it all depends on what you value. I could see a school like Stanford being in the top 5 with their academics, extremely strong minor sport resume, and still above average major sport standing.

by OStateJasper on Jun 8, 2011 8:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

Can't ignore schools like notre dame and Penn state,

I think both have bigger fan bases and more money than Florida. And Texas has an unfair advantage, 1/3 or their revenue comes from OU fans buying longhorn stickers to put on upside down.

Cowboys Ride For Free, Drinking PBR's and slappin ho's since 2010

by AUKingOState on Jun 8, 2011 8:30 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Sub the Golden Domers for Michigan, and that would probably be correct.

Innovators look at the same thing as everyone else, yet see something different.

by K. Scott Bailey on Jun 8, 2011 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

RE: Notre Dame and Penn State

If I was a conference commissioner of a league of universities, I don’t think Notre Dame would top my list. Their academics lack, there has been an entire generation who’s gone without seeing the Irish’s dominance, so they are no longer viewed as a top notch football program to current recruits, and they have an extremely small alumni base, although that may be negated by the fact that there are over a billion Catholics worldwide.

Penn State’s a little different. They have top tier academics, an enormous, wealthy alumni base, they come from a populous state, and they are on the short list of schools that could be considered the 5th or 6th school on my list. Florida doesn’t have the name brand that the Nittany Lions do, but they get more national media exposure, and their administration has made sure to do all that it can to keep the football program among the top of the college football world.

by Art Corvelay on Jun 8, 2011 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Florida has more pot than Penn state as well

And their athletes indulge more.

Cowboys Ride For Free, Drinking PBR's and slappin ho's since 2010

by AUKingOState on Jun 8, 2011 11:59 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

that is the top 5

what about the bottom 5?

sticking to BCS schools only -

5) Vanderbilt
4) Iowa State
3) Washington State
2) Baylor
1) Northwestern

by OStateJasper on Jun 8, 2011 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

Northwestern

Oh come on. Northwestern isn’t in the bottom 5. I wouldn’t even put them in the bottom 10. (Iowa state’s the last school I would add to my conference out of the big six).

10) Iowa State
9) Baylor
8) Wake Forest
7) Vanderbilt
6) Mississippi State
5) South Florida
4) Rutgers
3) Virginia
2) Washington State
1) Minnesota

by Art Corvelay on Jun 8, 2011 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

i considered Rutgers

but they are the only decent program in the most populous area of the country. i would love to have them just on the off chance that one day their program becomes decent and you have 15 million televisions in their viewing area. im good with the rest of your list, not sure why you love Northwestern so much though. all the research dollars?

by OStateJasper on Jun 8, 2011 12:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

You say Northwestern isn't in your bottom 10, but you put Virginia in your bottom 3?

I was thinking it was because of academics and non-revenue sports that you liked Northwestern, but now I’m confused.

by Texas Wahoo on Jun 8, 2011 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

No, Virginia is my 7th worst. I tried to clarify that at the end of my post, Iowa State would be my last choice for a BCS conference. Virginia hasn’t been good in anything for years, and they aren’t as good as Northwestern academically (especially research dollars). Northwestern has been solid in football for several years now, and they have been competitive in basketball.

by Art Corvelay on Jun 8, 2011 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Virginia is good at non-revenue sports (hence their current spot in the top ten of the Directors' Cup, while Northwestern sits at 35).

Northestern has certainly been better at the revenue sports in the last couple of years – and if we were deciding for the next five year, I might pick Northwestern ahead of Virginia because of that.

by Texas Wahoo on Jun 8, 2011 1:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Vandy has redeeming qualities

Good baseball
Good basketball
Great academics

by Gopher86 on Jun 10, 2011 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

I would just use learfield cup standings to decide

"If I ever saw an amputee getting hanged, I'd probably just start calling out letters" - Demetri Martin
O I E M I Z Z O U

by pinkelposse on Jun 8, 2011 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

How is this progressing?

There is a God and I'm not it, after that EVERYTHING is subjective. Be careful for what you wish for, you just might GET IT!

by mizzoufan1 on Jun 28, 2011 8:18 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A blog for those that love Stillwater, love the way they shave the canadian bacon at Hideaway, love Garth Brooks (un-ironically), love drinking coldish beer out of a plastic 22 ounce collectible cup, and love everything else that makes us Cowboys.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

39766_134323999942569_113657452009224_160227_7181545_n_small
Identity issues for the Mothership

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Samuel_small samuelbryant

Editors

Cincy_small CincyJoe

Crown_small Royal John

Authors

Camoblackice_small AUKingOState

Yachoff3_small Yachoffsmirnoff

Small Pokelahoma1